Comments on: A Model for Citation Metadata http://community.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/archives/2006/01/28/a-model-for-citation-metadata geek tools and the scholar Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Bruce D'Arcus http://community.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/archives/2006/01/28/a-model-for-citation-metadata/comment-page-1#comment-687 Bruce D'Arcus Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:56:29 +0000 http://netapps.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/darcusb/?p=217#comment-687 <p>Ian --</p> <p>Yes, my bad on the links; sorry about that. I'll try to get that sorted out ASAP. Ian Davis offered to host it at the vocab.org site, so am thinking about letting him deal with this :-)</p> <p>On the properties, I think the big hole right now is the classes, which is why I started there. There are, however, a few properties I'll likely add. One is to link references to events: maybe biblio:presentedAt. </p> <p>The other thing not well-covered by existing vocabularies is contributorship, which needs to be finer-grained than either dc:creator or foaf:maker. Leigh Dodds had been looking into that, so maybe we can figure out a solution there.</p> Ian –

Yes, my bad on the links; sorry about that. I’ll try to get that sorted out ASAP. Ian Davis offered to host it at the vocab.org site, so am thinking about letting him deal with this :-)

On the properties, I think the big hole right now is the classes, which is why I started there. There are, however, a few properties I’ll likely add. One is to link references to events: maybe biblio:presentedAt.

The other thing not well-covered by existing vocabularies is contributorship, which needs to be finer-grained than either dc:creator or foaf:maker. Leigh Dodds had been looking into that, so maybe we can figure out a solution there.

]]> By: Ian Dickinson http://community.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/archives/2006/01/28/a-model-for-citation-metadata/comment-page-1#comment-686 Ian Dickinson Sun, 05 Feb 2006 12:02:30 +0000 http://netapps.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/darcusb/?p=217#comment-686 <p>Bruce - Nice going on the bibliography ontology. I agree that we really need a decent, complete version of a biblio ontology - there are lots of incomplete ones on the web. </p> <p>You only have the classes defined so far - what about the properties? Or are you just going to rely on the FRBR properties for linking the instances? Also, the link on the schema documentation page to the normative RDF file doesn't work - the only way of getting a copy of your OWL is to copy/paste from the web page!</p> <p>Ian</p> Bruce - Nice going on the bibliography ontology. I agree that we really need a decent, complete version of a biblio ontology - there are lots of incomplete ones on the web.

You only have the classes defined so far - what about the properties? Or are you just going to rely on the FRBR properties for linking the instances? Also, the link on the schema documentation page to the normative RDF file doesn’t work - the only way of getting a copy of your OWL is to copy/paste from the web page!

Ian

]]>