<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Win for OpenDocument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://community.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/archives/2005/09/03/win-for-opendocument/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://community.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/archives/2005/09/03/win-for-opendocument</link>
	<description>geek tools and the scholar</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: darcusblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New MS XML Strategy?</title>
		<link>http://community.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/archives/2005/09/03/win-for-opendocument/comment-page-1#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>darcusblog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New MS XML Strategy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 16:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netapps.muohio.edu/blogs/darcusb/darcusb/archives/2005/09/03/win-for-opendocument#comment-671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] So awhile back I wrote regarding their XML file formats: As for Microsoft, they have two choices: open their file formats (e.g. submit them to a standards body, and remove any legal restrictions) to stem the tide toward OD, or add the ability to read and write OD to its suite. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So awhile back I wrote regarding their XML file formats: As for Microsoft, they have two choices: open their file formats (e.g. submit them to a standards body, and remove any legal restrictions) to stem the tide toward OD, or add the ability to read and write OD to its suite. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
